Once again proving herself beyond human understanding, Maureen Dowd bemoaned of Obama in her May 29th column, “Oddly, the good father who wrote so poignantly about growing up without a daddy scorns the paternal aspect of the presidency.”
The what?!?
Am I to understand that Dowd wants the presidency, open to all citizens of age, regardless of sex, to be paternal, while she wants the papacy, restricted by God Incarnate to men acting in persona Christi, to be feminine?
Is she just making this up as she goes along? No, wait. Don’t answer that.
How does one solve a problem like Maureen Dowd?